{'It’s like they’ve erupted out of someone’s subconscious': the way horror has come to dominate contemporary film venues.
The biggest jump-scare the cinema world has witnessed in 2025? The comeback of horror as a main player at the UK film market.
As a style, it has impressively exceeded past times with a 22% year-on-year increase for the British and Irish cinemas: over £83 million this year, versus £68,612,395 in 2024.
“Previously, zero horror films made £10 million in the UK or Ireland. Currently, five have surpassed that mark,” says a box office editor.
The top performers of the year – a recent horror title (£11.4 million), Sinners (£16.2m), The Conjuring Last Rites (£14.98m) and the sequel to a classic (£15.54 million) – have all remained in the theaters and in the popular awareness.
Even though much of the industry commentary centers on the unique excellence of renowned filmmakers, their triumphs point to something shifting between moviegoers and the category.
“I’ve heard people say, ‘Even if you don’t like horror this is a film you need to see,’” states a film distribution executive.
“Films like these play with genre and structure to create something completely different, and that speaks to an audience in a different way.”
But outside of artistic merit, the steady demand of spooky films this year implies they are giving cinemagoers something that’s much needed: catharsis.
“These days, movies echo the prevalent emotions of rage, anxiety, and polarization,” notes a genre expert.
“Scary movies excel at tapping into viewers' fears, amplifying them, allowing you to set aside daily worries and concentrate on the on-screen terror,” says a respected writer of classic monster stories.
In the context of a current events featuring geopolitical strife, enforcement actions, extremist rises, and ecological disasters, ghosts, monsters, and mythical entities resonate a bit differently with viewers.
“I read somewhere that the success of vampire movies is linked to economically depressed times,” comments an star from a recent horror hit.
“It’s the idea that capitalism sucks the life out of people.”
From film's inception, societal turmoil has shaped horror.
Analysts point to the rise of European artistic movements after the the Great War and the turbulent times of the post-war Germany, with films such as early expressionist works and Nosferatu: A Symphony of Horror.
Later occurred the 1930s depression and Universal Studios’ Frankenstein and The Wolfman.
“Take Dracula: it depicts an Eastern European figure invading Britain, spreading a metaphorical infection that endangers local protagonists,” notes a academic.
“Thus, it mirrors widespread fears about migration.”
The specter of migration shaped the recently released supernatural tale a recent film title.
The creator clarifies: “I aimed to delve into populist rhetoric. Specifically, calls to restore a mythical past that favored a privileged few.”
“Additionally, the notion that acquaintances might unexpectedly voice extreme views, leaving others shocked.”
Perhaps, the current era of praised, culturally aware scary films started with a brilliant satire debuted a year after a polarizing administration.
It sparked a fresh generation of visionary directors, including various prominent figures.
“Those years were remarkably vibrant,” says a filmmaker whose movie about a violent prenatal entity was one of the time's landmark films.
“I think it was the beginning of an era when people were opening up to doing a really bonkers horror film which had arthouse aspirations.”
The director, currently developing another scary story, continues: “During the past decade, viewers have become more receptive to such innovative approaches.”
Concurrently, there has been a revival of the underrated horror works.
In recent months, a independent theater opened in the capital, showing underground films such as The Greasy Strangler, The Fall of the House of Usher and the modern reinterpretation of Dr Caligari.
The fresh acclaim of this “gritty and loud” genre is, according to the cinema founder, a straightforward answer to the formulaic productions pumped out at the theaters.
“It’s a reaction to the sanitised product that’s coming out of Hollywood. You have a film scene that’s more tepid and more predictable. A lot of the mainstream films are very similar,” he states.
“Conversely, [such movies] appear raw. As if they emerged straight from the artist's mind, untouched by studio control.”
Fright flicks continue to upset the establishment.
“Horror possesses a dual nature, feeling both classic and current simultaneously,” notes an expert.
Alongside the return of the mad scientist trope – with several renditions of a well-known story on the horizon – he forecasts we will see horror films in the coming years responding to our present fears: about AI’s dominance in the coming decades and “vampires living in the Trump tower”.
In the interim, a biblical fright story The Carpenter’s Son – which narrates the tale of holy family challenges after the nativity, and includes well-known actors as the sacred figures – is set for release later this year, and will undoubtedly send a ripple through the religious conservatives in the America.</