🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking followers recognizing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of commenters praising your insights on growing your business? Do recruiters reaching out to discuss opportunities?

If not, the reason could be that you're not male.

The Test: Modifying Gender Identity for Increased Reach

Numerous female professionals joined a collective LinkedIn experiment this week after viral posts suggested that switching their gender to "man" enhanced their network presence.

Some participants rewrote their profiles to incorporate what they termed "masculine-oriented" terminology - inserting results-driven professional jargon like "propel", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their exposure similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Concerns Raised

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether an inherent gender bias in the platform's system favors men who employ professional networking terminology.

Similar to many large social media platforms, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to determine which posts appear to which users - promoting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

Through a blog post, LinkedIn recognized the trend but stated it does not factor in "demographic information" when deciding content distribution. Rather, the company explained that "numerous factors" influence how posts are received.

Changing gender on your profile does not influence how your posts appears in results or timelines.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who modified her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her name to "a masculine version", reported remarkable results.

"The statistics I'm seeing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she commented.

Another professional, a marketing expert, started testing after noticing her audience decline substantially.

The Process

• Initially, she modified her profile gender to "male"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her profile using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Lastly, she recycled old posts with comparable "agentic" style

The outcome was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in reach within one week.

The Downside

Although the positive results, Cornish expressed dissatisfaction with the method.

"Previously, my content were softer - concise and clever, but also warm and relatable," she explained. "Currently, the bro-coded version was assertive and confident - similar to a white male swaggering around."

She discontinued the experiment after one week, saying "Each day I continued, and results got better, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Not all participants experienced positive outcomes. One writer who changed both her profile gender to "male" and her race to "Caucasian" reported a reduction in visibility and engagement.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it functions in specific cases or why," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These experiments occur alongside ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a professional network and community site.

Recent changes in recent months have apparently caused female creators experiencing significantly reduced visibility, leading to unofficial tests where the same content by male and female users received dramatically unequal reach.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to classify and spread posts based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its systems, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson proposed that recent declines in certain members' visibility might stem from higher volume due to additional posts on the network.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester observed, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she remarked. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."