🔗 Share this article

In my role as a DM, I traditionally avoided heavy use of chance during my D&D sessions. I tended was for story direction and session development to be shaped by deliberate decisions rather than random chance. Recently, I opted to try something different, and I'm very pleased with the outcome.

The Spark: Observing an Improvised Tool

A popular podcast features a DM who frequently asks for "luck rolls" from the participants. The process entails selecting a type of die and defining consequences tied to the result. It's at its core no different from consulting a pre-generated chart, these get invented on the spot when a player's action doesn't have a clear conclusion.

I decided to try this approach at my own game, mostly because it looked novel and offered a break from my standard routine. The results were eye-opening, prompting me to reconsider the ongoing dynamic between pre-determination and randomization in a tabletop session.

A Memorable Story Beat

At a session, my party had just emerged from a massive battle. When the dust settled, a cleric character inquired after two key NPCs—a pair—had made it. In place of choosing an outcome, I let the dice decide. I instructed the player to roll a d20. The possible results were: on a 1-4, both died; a middling roll, only one would die; a high roll, they made it.

The player rolled a 4. This led to a incredibly emotional sequence where the party discovered the remains of their companions, forever clasped together in their final moments. The cleric performed funeral rites, which was particularly significant due to prior story developments. As a parting reward, I decided that the remains were suddenly restored, revealing a enchanted item. By chance, the bead's contained spell was precisely what the party lacked to address another major quest obstacle. You simply plan such serendipitous coincidences.

Honing On-the-Spot Skills

This incident led me to ponder if improvisation and making it up are truly the beating heart of this game. While you are a prep-heavy DM, your skill to pivot can rust. Players often find joy in derailing the best constructed plots. Therefore, a good DM must be able to think quickly and fabricate details on the fly.

Employing similar mechanics is a fantastic way to practice these abilities without straying too much outside your preparation. The key is to use them for minor decisions that won't drastically alter the campaign's main plot. As an example, I wouldn't use it to establish if the king's advisor is a secret enemy. Instead, I would consider using it to decide whether the party reach a location right after a critical event takes place.

Strengthening Collaborative Storytelling

This technique also works to maintain tension and foster the sensation that the game world is responsive, shaping based on their decisions as they play. It reduces the sense that they are merely characters in a DM's sole script, thereby strengthening the collaborative foundation of roleplaying.

This philosophy has long been integral to the game's DNA. Original D&D were reliant on encounter generators, which suited a playstyle focused on treasure hunting. While current D&D often prioritizes narrative and role-play, leading many DMs to feel they require detailed plans, it's not necessarily the required method.

Finding the Healthy Equilibrium

It is perfectly nothing wrong with being prepared. However, there is also no problem with letting go and allowing the rolls to determine certain outcomes in place of you. Control is a big part of a DM's job. We use it to run the game, yet we frequently find it hard to release it, at times when doing so can lead to great moments.

The core recommendation is this: Have no fear of relinquishing a bit of your plan. Experiment with a little chance for inconsequential details. The result could create that the unexpected outcome is infinitely more memorable than anything you might have scripted by yourself.